Tag Archives: healthcare

On being a loose cannon.

It is a distant memory at this point. I remember a single feedback session during my years as a pediatric resident. It was probably early in my junior resident year when senior residents and staff took call from home. My mentor was a respected senior oncologist. When we met, I could tell that he was struggling to summarize the staff’s evaluation of me.

He was finally able to put it into a single sentence:
“Chuck, you’re kind of perceived as being a loose cannon.”

It was a fair assessment.

I was the one who was most apt to forget to call the staff on call before starting a procedure. I acted at times as though I thought that policies and protocols just slowed us down. And I could stretch the rules slightly to help patients move through the systems more efficiently.

In retrospect, the eighties were a time when hospitals were much more dangerous. This kind of thinking didn’t help. 

The term “loose cannon” originated in the era of sailing warships where muzzle-loading cannons were secured to the wall of the gun deck with a system of ropes and pulleys that allowed them to be pulled out of the gun port, reloaded, rolled back, aimed and fired again in as quickly as 90 seconds.

A loose cannon was one that had broken free from the ropes that restrained it. When it fired, it rolled wildly and unpredictably around the deck, damaging other guns, injuring or killing crew members, potentially destabilizing the gun deck, and rendering the other guns inaccurate. In fact, a loose cannon couldn’t be fired, couldn’t be aimed, was ineffective and a threat to the ships staff and mission. Victor Hugo described a “loose cannon” as a monster; a machine turned into a beast that was uncontrolled and uncontrollable (“Ninety-Three,” 1874).

The “loose cannon” feedback was unfortunately an apt metaphor for what I would have described as “leadership” at that point of my personal and professional development. It was in essence a measure of unhinged enthusiasm coupled with initiative untampered by wisdom or experience. And I would say that it has been something of a long journey to try to rid myself of these tendencies, just as improving patient safety has been a long journey for health care.

The concept of patient safety really moved to the front of our collective consciousness with publication of the book, “To Err is Human” by the Institute of Medicine in the late nineties and the Institute of Healthcare Improvement’s successful “100,000 lives” campaign (2004-2006). 

As pediatric department chief in the early aughts, patent safety became personal when I first heard the preventable hospital death of the toddler Josie King and the revolution in patient safety her parents and providers subsequently led for the nation (2001). When I was a new hospital CEO, Dr. Atul Gawande’s pioneering research and 2009 book, “The Checklist Manifesto” was another milestone for me as was John Nance’s book, “Why Hospitals Should Fly,” comparing aviation safety to the ways hospitals operated (2008).

We have all witnessed the revolution of the past decades, and I am convinced that hospitals are far safer than they were when I was a first year resident forty years ago last summer. In July of that year, just 12 months and a handful of days out of medical school, I became the “senior pediatrician” in the hospital at night. That was the standard at the time. Thankfully, it no longer is.

We have come a long way. I’d like to think that I have, too. 

But recently while I was leading a meeting as the director of a city-wide public health effort, I made a statement that I felt was helpful, but that the project’s senior leader had to take the time to clarify.

A day or so later, after having taken some time to think about it, she gently suggested to me that she needed me to be reliably predictable, and that by my making the statement she was not prepared to explain, I had not been the leader she needed.

In other words: I needed to not be a loose cannon.

I am not much of a beer drinker. When I moved to Baltimore, if I did have a beer, I tended towards a particular brand. The brewer was Heavy Seas. The IPA was “Loose Cannon.” It might have been the name.

The beer has been a good reminder of the continued journey for health care and my development as a leader. We are all still learning. “Loose cannon” is a brand better imbibed than embodied. 

Chuck Callahan Henry V 4.3 – Lead from the Front https://henryv43.com/

 

 

3 Comments

Filed under General Leadership, health care leadership, Personal Leadership

Community Health Work: “What do I need to know?”

A few months ago, an executive coach I’ve known since the early months of the pandemic asked me a question about the community health work I have been doing for the past several years.

“Tell me five things about working in the community that you think I should know.”

I have thought about the question and the answers I spontaneously gave him since, confident that one thing is certain: I don’t really know completely. And I know that I won’t ever completely know. So in that spirit of true humility, when asked I focused on what I was learning, and I gave it a try.

It is worth noting that I spent the first thirty of the forty years of my professional career in the U.S. Military, where everyone had a job, a house, education and access to free health care. It is clear to me now that military members are under greater stress from health related social needs than I realized while I was in uniform. Regardless, in the transition a decade ago from this successful, single-payer, government health system, the biggest wakeup call I experienced was coming face to face with the lack of the same social supports for the patients I now cared for.

For the past decade, I worked in population health as the payer systems evolved to include models of “value-based care.” Over time, it became clear that the greatest value we could provide would be to work with community partners to assure economic growth and stability, housing, transportation and food access as well as health education and seamless health care access for our patients. The individuals of the urban community where my wife and I have lived, worked and worshiped have vastly different life experiences than we do. We continue to learn from them.

Since stepping away from a hospital population health role eighteen months ago, my role has largely been in community health. Thus, my coach’s request. This is what I told him.  

 “Nothing about us without us.”  This is the first lesson we all learn. It almost seems hackneyed except that we continue to pay less attention to it than we should. The phrase has Latin roots, “Nihil de nobis, sine nobis,” popularized in Europe as the standard for establishing foreign policy and legislation. It was made popular in the U.S. in the nineties by author James Charlton, who adopted the saying from South African disability activists. The idea has been applied to a range of community organizations and efforts working alongside historically marginalized individuals and groups.

The classic (unfortunately still common) example in university settings is a grant proposal designed by academics to study members of the community without any insight from the study population along with a request for endorsement from the academic department or center imagined to be working with “them” most closely. “They” should have been a part of the conversation from the beginning.

“Initiatives in communities of color should be led by leaders of color from the community.” It is more than just “optics.”  It is a matter of better visual acuity: being able to see more clearly. There are too many things that quite simply cannot be learned or taught. These are the things that are experienced, and they are the exclusive possession of those who have lived them. That is what these leaders bring to the table, and why they should ideally have the seat at the head. No one really likes someone else’s great idea. This is especially true when the great idea is about you.

“The work may not be professionally rewarding.” In an academic setting, every lecture or seminar contributes towards promotion for junior faculty. But where on the CV do we record Sunday afternoons spent at community sites reinforcing asthma inhaler technique with children and their parents, or teaching community health providers about measuring blood pressure correctly? In terms of community research, you really can’t just study, write and publish whatever you want from the work you are doing. It’s not your data. And it’s not your story. However, in my experience, what is lacking in professional reward is more than accounted for by work that is personally rewarding.

“If you are not uncomfortable, you are probably not crossing cultural boundaries.” People from different backgrounds approach problems differently. And that can make us uncomfortable. We respond to these differences in a range of different ways. One of the ways is our response to leadership. If you’re not at least a little uncomfortable, you may not be following the community leaders. We like being in charge, especially as physicians. And whether we know it or not, we can sometimes assume and subtly communicate that we could do the job better. Or even worse, our bias leads us to unconsciously assume that a leader from a marginalized population is intrinsically less qualified to run a project than we we are. I used to wonder at times why some of my community-based peers often need to present their credentials when they enter a new public setting. Perhaps it is because of the inherent tendency of people like me to at least act like we assume they have none.

“It is a near vertical learning curve with no plateau.” I am not a rock climber, but I suspect that you can’t climb a vertical without help. Or at least you shouldn’t try. But that means we must also do the work and the preparation to make the climb. As the poet Maya Angelo said, “Do the best you can until you know better. And when you know better, do better.” In this work, we are continually learning. And the greatest risk is the assumption that we finally “understand.”

Perhaps to put it more succinctly, for those of us from outside the community, working alongside community partners for the community’s health is a lifelong journey. It is a near vertical climb where you never really arrive. You do not want to make the climb without someone who knows the mountain.

And you don’t want to make the climb alone.

Chuck Callahan Henry V 4.3 – Lead from the Front   https://henryv43.com/

2 Comments

Filed under health care leadership, Uncategorized

The case for a cowboy.

For the last several years, I have been using Dr. Atul Gawande’s graduation speech to the Harvard Medical School Class of 2011 (“Cowboys and Pit Crews) in teaching about the evolution of health care delivery I have witnessed over my years in practice.

When my medical career began (during Reagan’s first presidential term), hierarchical “parallel mono-disciplinary” care was the typical patient’s experience, where a patient was passed between specialists and hospitals until someone (hopefully) took the time to sit down and listen to their journey, piece together the story, mine the available paper records and validate the patient’s concerns with a reasonable differential diagnostic and therapeutic plan. This pattern of care delivery continues in many settings today.

In the closing decades of the last century we moved forward considerably with multidisciplinary (multiple specialties looking at the same patient at the same time, often in the same clinical space) and interdisciplinary teams (multiple specialties looking at the same patient at the same time, including the voice of patient and family, and agreeing on a single patient and family-centered set of treatment goals).

More recently, we have increasingly recognized that health is more than the absence of disease. The true drivers of health are determined by the 8,759 hours a year our patients spend at home in their community rather than the roughly one hour a year the average American spends in a provider’s office. In the future, the individual and population’s health will be addressed by a new model of integrated, community-care teams that include health care professionals but also community navigators and service providers as equal partners who are able to address issues like housing, food security, employment and economics. (But that’s the subject for another post.)

Time has proven that Dr. Gawande was right. The future of health care depends on our ability to function like pit crew teams with broad, horizontal, flexible, situational leadership structures.

But for the past several weeks, I wish we had a cowboy.

Not long ago, a close family member was diagnosed with an aggressive, fatal condition. Unfortunately, we had to derive some of that diagnosis and prognosis from our own research, from combing through the on-line patient portal, using search engine AI and by reaching out to physicians through the “doctor-to-doctor” informal communication system.

The ambulatory provider who had cared for this family member for decades was not a part of the hospital team. The inpatient health care team members were attentive and empathetic. The leader of every team—nursing and physician—met with us. But no one seemed to be willing to address the bigger picture.

I know from my many years practicing pediatric intensive care that there is no joy in delivering terrible news. I recognized in myself long ago the subconscious tendency to avoid this unpleasant, uncomfortable task. I doubt I am alone. And so, we are all at risk to abrogate (“evade a responsibility or duty”) and thus abdicate (“fail to undertake a responsibility or duty”) when it comes to sharing bad news.

This can be compounded by aspects of team-thinking, including a tendency to defer to other specialties when higher-level conversations are needed. The trend towards “super-specialization” may contribute to the practice of leaving some of the tough conversations surrounding death and dying to the palliative or hospice care teams. But they should be invited into the treatment team after these difficult conversations have taken place and not before.

As strangers to the hospital and staff, what we needed was one person.

What we were missing was a cowboy.

We did not need the old-school bluster, swagger, arrogance or patriarchal condescension that occasionally characterized physicians of my era and before. For example, I was told that just before I started my first job in the seventies as a hospital technician in a coronary care unit, the nurses were expected to stand when the senior physician walked onto the unit. That’s not the kind of “cowboy” we were looking for.

We needed a consistent, straight-shooting clinical leader who helped prepare us as a family to make difficult decisions about our loved one’s treatment and outcomes; one voice to whom we knew we could turn over the weeks that this disease took its toll and perhaps even beyond, when the inevitable second guessing becomes an element of grieving. It could have been a person from any specialty. While the hospital inpatient physician and nursing teams justifiably rotated on a daily and weekly basis, we needed someone whom we saw every day, who checked on us and helped us understand the evolving clinical situations in the context of the bigger picture.

Hospitals are infinitely safer, more compassionate, and better organized than when my medical career began in the eighties. The evolution, promulgation and proliferation of healthcare teams has without question been a key driver of these improvements. We would no more go back to the stoic, isolated, aloof physician as sole decision maker than we would give up the electronic medical record to return to paper and pen.

Health care teams are the future of medicine, in clinical settings and in the community.

But sometimes, at specific points across the span of life, we still need consistent, visible leadership.

I think we still need cowboys.

Chuck Callahan Henry V 4.3 – Lead from the Front   https://henryv43.com/

7 Comments

Filed under health care leadership, Organizational Leadership

The Bat-Phone and Leader Presence

Recently I had the opportunity to speak to the mother of an infant hospitalized with respiratory illness in a hospital in another state. She was the daughter of a friend of a relative but it was a joy to speak to her, talk through some of her concerns and reassure her that from what she was telling me, she was in good hands. (Her baby did well!)

In the course of the conversation, I remembered that I knew a senior physician at the hospital and I send him a quick text. By the time I caught up with him a little while later, he had already been to the patient’s room. He missed the baby’s mother but left his card with his cell-phone number in case she needed anything.

His generous gesture reminded me of the “Bat-Phone” we instituted when I was a hospital CEO (Commander) a decade or so ago. I am relatively sure that I stole the idea from Quint Studer or another of the quality and patient experience gurus to whom we owe so much of the great things we were able to do at that facility while we were shaping a “Culture of Excellence.” We shared the Bat-Phone cell phone number with all of our staff, our hospitalized and ambulatory patients – probably thousands of people. I carried the phone with me every day. It was a visible symbol of our efforts to be accessible to our staff and patients. In addition to the phone number, we also had a link on our public and internal websites where people could reach out to the CEO by email directly. Continue reading

6 Comments

Filed under General Leadership, Personal Leadership, Uncategorized

“Of course!”

 

A PICU nurse said that to me recently. We had just finished doffing and were walking out of the hot zone transition area of the Convention Center COVID field hospital where we worked. We struck up a conversation and at the end of our exchange I thanked her for serving these patients with us. “Of course!” was her reply.

I think I have heard that response more often these days. Perhaps it is cultural or generational (millennial?). Or maybe it’s just a new colloquialism characteristic of the times. I can’t recall whether it was as common before COVID as it seems to be now. But maybe I should just blame that on “COVID time.” (It seems I can’t remember a lot of things from before COVID.)

In the case of this nurse the “Of course!” took on special meaning. We talked about our shared experience working in pediatric intensive care and the special calling it takes to be a nurse in that setting. She told me that she loved taking care of critically ill children, but when this contingency COVID hospital was established she wanted to be a part of it. The unit where she worked couldn’t allow her go to part-time, so she resigned. And she has been a part of caring for the more than 1,300 adults with COVID we have admitted in our past year or so of operation.

She left something she loved to be part of something she felt needed to be done.

In his mid-twentieth science fiction novel “Starship Troopers” (Putnam 1959), Robert Heinlein wrote “Duty is the social equivalent of self-interest.” It is “the basis of all morality.” It strikes me that duty was not something we heard as much about before the pandemic. Attention and devotion to duty seem to be common virtues now. Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

“The Service” & the Social Determinants of Health

In presentations I have made in the past year or two I have had to confess to a relative inexperience and unfamiliarity with the social factors that can adversely affect a population’s health and well-being.

My inexperience is the result of having spent nearly my entire medical and leadership career practicing in the military medical system. Until recently my patients, their parents and families were all active duty or retired military. As a group they had education, jobs, housing and access to healthcare. We know that only about 20% of what makes our patients well or not is a result of health care (despite our inclination to think that those of us in health care are located at the center of the wellness universe). For the remaining eighty percent of what influences health and well-being, our military patients had the benefit of the positive effect of education, jobs and housing. Continue reading

3 Comments

Filed under General Leadership, Uncategorized